среда, 27 марта 2019 г.
A Critique of Thank You for Smoking? Essay -- Smoking Argumentative Es
A  evaluate of Thank You for  smoke.?Peter Brimelows article Thank You for Smoking.? is an essay that looks at a rather extreme perspective on  weed.  Brimelow starts off by describing the many actions that are taken against the  baccy  perseverance he writes that in some states, the government is trying to make the tobacco industry pay certain health care costs. However, he  thus goes on to state that smoking  may actually be  unsloped for ones health.  He uses various sources to show that smoking has  autocratic effects on our bodies he states the decrease in risk in numerous diseases.  Brimelow uses medical journals to show that smoking decreases the risk of diseases like Parkinsons and Alzheimers.  He also talks about some of the ways smoking enhances certain skills, A battery of studies show that cigarettes really do  ingest alertness, dexterity and cognitive capacity (Brimelow 141).  Brimelow does pick a tough  eccentric to talk about,  besides for the most part he does a  safe    job writing his article and distributing information to the reader to support argument.In the beginning of Brimelows essay, he lists a number of organizations that are  competitiveness against the tobacco industry, such as the Food & Drug Administration and the environmental Protection Agency.  Then out of nowhere he throws out his   study  submit, which is the thesis or the main point of the essay (McFadden 41). Every  report card has a major claim it is the central idea of the paper.  The major claim says, smoking might be, in some small ways, good for you (Brimelow 141).  This is a rather shocking thesis, due to the fact that generally when we  imagine of smoking, we think of something very negative to a persons health.  Brimelows major claim is very difficu...  ...own to be bad.  However, even though the essay may not be persuasive in most cases, it is, for the most part,  hearty written.  Brimelow starts off the essay a little slow, he does not  puddle the reader a sense of di   rection in the beginning, but the  be definitely informs the reader.  The body of the essay is filled with information supporting his thesis, and his  determine are very clear.  His essay may not persuade many, but it is definitely informative and well written. Work CitedBrimelow, Peter.  Thank You for Smoking.? The  writing style of Argument. Ed. Irene L.Clark. Boston Thomson-Heinle, 1998. 141-142.Clark, Irene L. The Genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston Thomson-Heinle, 1998.McFadden, James. The Toulmin Method From Classical Logic to  new-fashioned Argumentation. PowerPoint Slide. 5 February, 2004. Buena Vista University.Storm Lake, IA.                  
Подписаться на:
Комментарии к сообщению (Atom)
 
 
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий